April’s hotter-than-expected inflation reading is likely to put the Fed on watch for higher energy costs creeping into other prices, a red line that, if crossed, could raise the possibility of interest rate hikes.

The Consumer Price Index rose 3.8% in April, compared with expectations for a rise of 3.7%, and up from 3.3% in March. Energy prices accounted for 40% of the increase, while shelter and food also surged.

“The fact that higher input costs from oil are being readily passed through to consumers, as well as other signs of broadening inflation impact, should both add to the Fed’s worries about inflation,” said Preston Caldwell, chief US economist at Morningstar. “The odds of a rate hike in 2026, while still less than 50%, are rising.”

According to CME FedWatch, markets on Tuesday morning were pricing in a nearly 98% chance that the Fed will hold rates steady at its next meeting in June and through most of 2026. But looking out to December, there’s now a nearly 30% chance of a rate hike.

Stripping out energy and food prices, the inflation index on a “core” basis clocked in at 2.8%, compared with expectations of 2.7% and up from 2.6% previously. Services inflation excluding energy was up 3.3%, while goods prices, which have been pushed higher by tariffs, rose 1.1%.

Stephen Brown, chief North America economist for Capital Economics, said pressure on core inflation is “still a bit too strong for comfort, and the [Federal Open Market Committee] is likely to be concerned by renewed signs of food inflation accelerating, given the risk that higher gasoline and food prices together will further boost households’ inflation expectations.”

Members of the Fed who pushed to change language in the central bank’s policy statement, indicating the next interest rate move would be a cut, will likely push harder to shift the statement to the possibility that the next rate move could be an increase.

“We’re not getting rate cuts this year, guys,” Joe Brusuelas, chief economist for RSM, said in an interview on Yahoo Finance. “If you’re a forward-looking central banker, in good conscience, you’re not going to be arguing for a rate cut. What you’re going to be doing is talking about changing the risk bias inside the statement, setting up two-sided risks.”

Brusuelas added, “So you build a bridge in case you do have to hike rates if this war moves on a lot longer and this inflation gets sticky and it’s persistent.”

AUSTIN, TEXAS - MAY 11: An employee restocks eggs at an H-E-B grocery store on May 11, 2026, in Austin, Texas. The U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) suggests that rising fuel prices may be beginning to weigh on wholesale margins, as ongoing tensions in the Strait of Hormuz continue to strain global energy markets.  (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
An employee restocks eggs at an H-E-B grocery store on May 11, 2026, in Austin, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images) · Brandon Bell via Getty Images

Why the Fed might see this energy spike differently

Typically, when there’s an oil price surge from a conflict, the central bank tends to treat it as a one-off and looks through it, with the expectation that prices will come back down.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *